Michael E. Raynor

For all the insight it offers, core competence thinking can be limiting. Specifically, for a firm’s core competence to be a source of competitive advantage, it must contribute to a firm’s ability to deliver improvements that relate the current basis of competition in an industry. In other words, it is not much use being good at something if no one wants to pay you to do it. Staying competitive as the basis of competition shifts does not mean getting better and better at the same thing. It means learning the new skills and competencies needed to provide the kind and level of performance that consumers will pay for.

Like this content? Why not share it?
Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterGoogle+Share on LinkedInBuffer this pagePin on PinterestShare on Redditshare on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.