Giampaolo Garzarelli

A healthy firm … constantly strives to place capability and rights to act on that capability in the same hands—a co-location problem. Jensen & Meckling specify that there are generally two ways we might solve this problem of co-location. We could let knowledge move to those who have the rights to act; or we could let the rights to act move to those with knowledge. The co-location of decision rights to (nonspecific) knowledge is possible only in markets. …in a market I can voluntarily exchange or sell the decision rights that accompany my knowledge. This is not possible in internal organization. In internal organization individuals are traditionally directed to a task on the basis of their implied capabilities, that is, the co-location proceeds in the opposite direction of markets—from (specific) knowledge to decision rights. Now, there are infinite ways to co-locate capabilities to decision rights. … This suggests that the difference among different organizational forms resides in the degree of decision-right autonomy. … Hence, one ‘efficiency’ criterion to evaluate different organizational forms on a comparative basis may reside in their relative ability to facilitate the co-location of capabilities and decision-making.

Like this content? Why not share it?
Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInBuffer this pagePin on PinterestShare on Redditshare on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon
There Are No Comments
Click to Add the First »