Every time researchers study the effect of the CEO on firm performance, they contribute to the idea that the big boss has a make-or-break effect, even though research usually finds that he doesn’t. Most people-including CEOs-would agree they can’t save a company on their own, so why do corporate boards persist in looking for a savior in a shrinking (and somewhat discredited) pool of saviors?
There Are No Comments
Click to Add the First »
Click to Add the First »