Michael Raynor [Archive.org URL]

The big issue is the collision between uncertainty and commitment. The [strategy] paradox is a function of that underlying tension. So the strategies that succeed biggest are the strategies that are based on the boldest and the most difficult to imitate, and hence hard-to-reverse commitments. The problem is…it takes time for these things to unfold; and so as a consequence you are necessarily required to make choices today based on beliefs about what you think is going to drive performance in the future; and as we’ve discussed the future is irreducibly uncertain; and so there’s a very real probability that you will commit to the wrong things. And so that’s where the paradox comes from: precisely the same sorts of behaviors that are systematically associated with success are also systematically associated with total collapse.

Like this content? Why not share it?
Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInBuffer this pagePin on PinterestShare on Redditshare on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon
There Are No Comments
Click to Add the First »