Des Dearlove and Stuart Crainer

Most bungled successions can be traced to five failings.
First, many incumbents are reluctant to give up power, either hanging on too long or trying to foist like-minded successors onto their boards.
Second, when appointing new leaders, boards often choose a safe replacement, rather than someone who will question the directors’ roles.
Third, swayed by force of personality, boards frequently fail to define or adhere to an objective set of selection criteria.
Fourth, many don’t look beyond the most visible senior management candidates, and therefore fail to identify strong potentials from the next generation of executives.
Finally, short-term concerns-such as antsy shareholders-are allowed to dictate the succession timetable.
Add to this the usual heady mix of egos, corporate politics and greed, and you have a recipe for trouble.

Like this content? Why not share it?
Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterGoogle+Share on LinkedInBuffer this pagePin on PinterestShare on Redditshare on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon

Leave a Reply


or

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.