Why the traditional option-pricing model may not be the best way to value employee grants.
Content: Related Content
Related Content
- An Ounce of Prevention
- Anchoring Employees with the Lure of Stock Options
- Are Stock Option Rescissions an Unfair Benefit?
- Are Stock Options In Your Future?
- Background Report: Employee Stock Options (.pdf)
- Employee Stock Options: Their Use and Policy Implications
- Executive Stock Options Boost Company Performance But Options to Rank-and-File Workers Show Minimal Effect
- Getting What You Pay for with Stock Options
- Going to Work for a Startup? Let’s Talk Equity
- How Employees Value (Often Incorrectly) Their Stock Options
- Incentive or Gift? How Perception of Employee Stock Options Affects Performance
- Is the Reprice Right? (Part One)
- Is the Reprice Right? (Part Two)
- It’s Not Just How Many, But Who Gets Stock Options That Matters
- J. C. de Swaan and Neil W. C. Harper
- Less Ado about Options
- One Way to Settle the Controversy over Stock Options: Eliminate Them
- Opting for Stock Options
- Out of Options
- Re-examining Stock Options as a Way to Compensate Executives
- Recognize the True Cost of Compensation
- Repricing of Stock Options
- Startup Best Practices 16 – Option Pool Planning
- Startup Stock Options
- Stock Option Repricing: Employees Benefit But What about Investors?
- Stock Options and Long Term IPO Performance
- Stock Options and Related Plans
- Stock Options: The End of the Affair?
- Stock-Based Compensation and the Cost of Capital
- Term Sheet – Vesting
- The Danger of Stock Option Grants
- The Technology Entrepreneur’s Guidebook
- Toting Up Stock Options
- Valuing Employee Stock Options: A Comparison of Alternative Models (.pdf)
- What’s a Stock Worth?
- Who Rules Accounting?
Like this content? Why not share it?
There Are No Comments
Click to Add the First »
Click to Add the First »