Authors contend that the current business model, which arose in the mills of Britain more than a century ago and has evolved ever since, is no longer sufficient for these times. They claim to propose a “new” business model (see comments).
Content: Article
Authors: Albert J. Viscio, Bruce A. Pasternack
Source: “strategy+business”
Subject: Management
Authors: Albert J. Viscio, Bruce A. Pasternack
Source: “strategy+business”
Subject: Management
Related Content
- Chains, Shops, and Networks: The Logic of Organizational Value
- A Better Way to Think About Your Business Model
- A Model for Success
- A range of options in business models
- Andrea Ovans, Joan Magretta
- Bringing Business Models Down to Earth
- Business Model Canvas
- Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers
- Business Model, Schmizness Model
- Business Models: Cautionary Tales
- Can You Innovate Your Business Model?
- Cast in Concrete or Carved in Water: Five Business Model Myths That Hold Companies Back
- Circular Advantage: Innovative Business Models and Technologies that Create Value
- Creating Value Through E-Commerce Business Models
- Driving Growth with Business Model Innovation
- Establishing a Continuing Business Model Innovation Process
- Four Business Models for the Digital Age
- Free! Why $0.00 Is the Future of Business
- From Strategy to Business Models and to Tactics
- How Business Models Can Make or Break a Merger
- How To Create A Disruptive Business Model
- How to Fashion Your New E-Business Model
- Julian Birkinshaw
- Should You Reinvent Your Business Model?
- The 9 Elements of an Ironclad Business Model
- The Centerless Corporation: A Model For Tomorrow
- Using Business Model Innovation to Reinvent the Core: Doing Something New with Something Old
- Value Drivers of e-Commerce Business Models
- What Is a Business Model?
- What Makes a Good Business Model, Anyway?
Like this content? Why not share it?
There Is 1 Comment
Click to See or Add Your Own »
Click to See or Add Your Own »
What I read wasn’t really a “new” business model but rather a clever re-packaging. There’s little that can really be argued against in the article (with the exception that their focus on knowledge and people is too narrow) but there is likewise nothing truly compelling. And that’s probably the biggest weakness of the article.